2025 has been the year of public-domain horror, a strange, exciting, sometimes brilliant, sometimes baffling wave of movies born from characters finally free from copyright.
Some filmmakers leaned into Gothic elegance.
Others into silent-era shadows.
And one… well, one sailor-man went feral.
Here’s a look back at the three most talked-about public-domain horrors of the year: Frankenstein, Nosferatu, and Popeye’s Revenge.
⚡ Frankenstein (2025) — A Monster Reborn
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein has lived in the public domain for generations, which means every era gets the chance to reinterpret the creature in its own image.
But this year’s adaptation stands out.
The 2025 Frankenstein brings together:
- Romantic Gothic visuals echoing the earliest illustrations
- Vanitas-inspired imagery tied to the novel’s themes of mortality
- A surreal emotional tone that blurs the line between man and monster
It returns Frankenstein to its roots — tragic, atmospheric, and morally heavy — while still feeling fresh enough for a new generation.
It’s exactly the kind of public-domain horror done right: respectful, imaginative, and genuinely cinematic.
Love the new Frankenstein movie??? Check out our Frankenstien Merch
🧛 Nosferatu (Released January 1st, 2025 — UK)
The year began in the best possible way: with the rebirth of one of horror’s oldest shadows.
The brand-new Nosferatu officially released January 1st, 2025 in the UK, ringing in the new year with Gothic dread.
This new version leans into:
- German Expressionist visuals reminiscent of the 1922 classic
- Angular shadows and distorted silhouettes
- A more tragic, almost sympathetic Count Orlok
It’s proof that some stories grow more powerful when they’re free.
Nosferatu has survived copyright battles, destruction orders, and a century of imitators — and its 2025 return shows why it remains the backbone of cinematic horror.
🥬 Popeye’s Revenge (2025) — When Public Domain Goes… Wrong
And then there’s Popeye’s Revenge.
If Frankenstein showed what public domain can elevate… Popeye showed what it can destroy.
Once an innocent, beloved cartoon icon, Popeye becomes a muddled slasher villain — and not in a clever or subversive way.
The film leans heavily on shock value:
- A mascot-turned-killer
- Gory set pieces with little purpose
- A plot stretched thin over a gimmick
Nostalgia misused instead of reimagined
In theory, public-domain reinterpretations should unlock creativity.
But Popeye’s Revenge feels more like a cash-grab — a horror parody stretched into a feature film, lacking the charm of the original or the artistry of classics like Frankenstein and Nosferatu.
It’s the downside of the public-domain boom:
just because you can reinvent a character doesn't mean you should.
💀 What 2025 Taught Us About Public-Domain Horror
This year delivered three wildly different examples of how creators use public-domain stories:
- Respectful reinvention → Frankenstein
- Artful revival → Nosferatu
- Chaotic misfire → Popeye’s Revenge
And that contrast is what makes public-domain horror so fascinating.
When characters are freed from copyright, they can become masterpieces… or disasters.
But they always become something new.
Frankenstein felt timeless.
Nosferatu felt reborn.
Popeye felt like a warning.
And all three proved that the future of horror is tied to the past — especially the past that belongs to everyone.
✨ Which of these public-domain horrors fascinated you the most this year — the revival, the reinvention, or the complete meltdown?
